Attraction / Detraction
Attraction condenses. Detraction stretches relation without breaking it.
Established term · relational depth
“The key concepts are the organizing principles of semantic gravity (context-dependence) and semantic density (complexity).”
Legitimation Code Theory · Semantics ↗
That is the established definition. Semantic Gravitation keeps it intact, then asks what relations compose a context and what meaning does as it passes through them.
Semantic gravity tells us how strongly meaning depends on context. It does not claim to be the whole system of meaning. Three Semonika concepts open the next layer: Attraction / Detraction, Complementarity, and Relatio.
Attraction condenses. Detraction stretches relation without breaking it.
Difference can fit. Relation does not require resemblance.
Meaning is not added to relation. Meaning happens through relation.
Within Legitimation Code Theory, semantic gravity varies in strength. Meaning can be more tightly tied to a particular context or less dependent on that context. Semantic density is the paired concept for complexity.
Meaning relies more strongly on a particular setting, case, or practice to remain intelligible.
Meaning can travel further from a particular setting and be expressed more abstractly or generally.
The definition tells us how tightly meaning is tied to context. It does not name every relation inside that context, nor what those relations do to meaning.
Concentrates, converges, and increases local relational density.
Controlled relational stretch: enough slip to preserve transfer without breaking the relation.
A bee and a flower do not need to resemble each other. Their differences can become mutually consequential.
Similarity is one mode of relation. Complementarity is another. Relatio is prior to both.
Relatio makes meaningful sense.
This is not a simulation or redefinition of LCT semantic gravity. It is a conceptual instrument for seeing what becomes visible when context is treated as a system of relations.
Candidate B is not the most similar item. It is the one whose different function fits the current need.
A context-only comparison sees low similarity and only moderate prominence, so the candidate looks weak.
Boundary: this instrument belongs to this site’s explanatory bridge. It is not the LCT definition of semantic gravity and not a universal ranking law.
Two further terms describe conditions that a simple attraction metaphor does not capture.
The state of readiness of a system to perform its next action in the current configuration.
The timing condition under which different processes can become mutually effective.
What relations receive meaning, transform it, sustain it, and give it consequence?
Semantic gravity names context-dependence. It does not, by itself, describe the full relational system through which meaning arises and moves.
Explore Semonic Fields →Semonic Fields asks where meaning can emerge. Semonika asks how meaning arises, gains structure, persists, moves through relation, and becomes form.
Continue to Semonika →The quoted definition comes from the official Legitimation Code Theory Semantics page ↗. What follows it on this site is our bridge into the wider relational vocabulary of Semonika.
Semantic gravity: context-dependence.
Semantic density: complexity.
Which relations compose context and carry meaning?
Semonika studies what meaning does in a living system.