Semantic Gravity · Semonika

Gravity pulls.
Meaning does more.

“Semantic gravity (SG) refers to the degree to which meaning relates to its context.”

Karl Maton · Making semantic waves · 2013, p. 11 · paper ↗

That definition measures context-dependence. Semonika places gravity inside a wider mechanics of meaning: attraction is one force, not the whole field.

01 / Karl Maton · Legitimation Code Theory

What the published definition actually says.

Maton defines semantic gravity as a relative degree of context-dependence. Stronger semantic gravity means that meaning depends more on its context; weaker semantic gravity means that it depends less on that context.

Semantic gravity · SG

Context-dependence.

A continuum from meanings that rely strongly on a particular context to meanings that rely on it less.

KARL MATON / LCT2013
Semantic density · SD

Condensation of meaning.

A separate continuum describing how much meaning is condensed within a practice, symbol, term, concept or expression.

KARL MATON / LCT2013

Semantic gravity and semantic density are two variables, not a complete physics of meaning.

Semonika · boundary of the comparison
Visual bridge

One force enters
a wider field.

Semonika keeps the source definition visible, then asks what gravity alone cannot describe: stretching, complementary fit and relation itself.

Diagram contrasting semantic attraction with controlled stretching that preserves relation.
Force pair

Attraction / Detraction

Concentration is not the only productive movement.

Bee and flower diagram showing complementary forms in a consequential relation.
Relation mode

Complementarity

A relation can work through difference, not only similarity.

Relatio diagram showing distinct nodes joined in a meaning-bearing relation.
Primary condition

Relatio

The operation exists only inside a relation.

02 / Dragan Cvetanović · Semonika

Put gravity inside the mechanics of meaning.

Semonika treats physical relations, forces and transformations as a disciplined vocabulary for operations on meaning. The construction is systematic: a physical function receives the suffix -sema when it is mapped into the semonic field.

R

Resosema

Resonance: amplification when an external signal meets the internal frequency of a system.

C

Compresema

Compression: complexity held in a smaller form that must still be capable of being unpacked.

↗

Refrasema

Refraction: meaning changes angle and speed as it passes into another social or media context.

≈

Difrasema

Diffraction: meaning bends through a narrow opening in noise and passes an obstacle while retaining form.

I

Intersema

Interference: signals can reinforce one another or cancel one another.

D

Doplesema

Doppler relation: the apparent frequency changes as a signal approaches or recedes in time.

P

Polarisema

Polarisation: a signal is filtered until it oscillates in one imposed plane.

A

Absorbsema

Absorption: a signal enters the system but returns no reflection, decision or action.

Gravity only pulls. Semonika also compresses, stretches, refracts, diffracts, resonates, interferes, scatters and absorbs.

Dragan Cvetanović · Semonika: Fizika značenja
03 / Operations on text

A text can be worked like a physical system.

These terms become useful when they change an editorial decision. The point is not to decorate criticism with physics, but to name what the text is doing and where the transfer of meaning fails.

Detraction / critical stretching

Stretch while the thread still carries meaning.

Context, rhythm, texture and time can enrich a passage. Once the load-bearing relation weakens or breaks, productive stretching becomes a floskula.

Defloskulizacija

Remove expansion that no longer carries meaning.

This is not automatic shortening. It is the removal of words, images or structures that continue after the semantic thread has lost its load.

Compresema

Compress without destroying the structure.

A sentence may become shorter and stronger only if the reader can still unpack the distinctions it contains.

Refrasema / Difrasema / Resosema

Test passage, obstacle and resonance.

Does the meaning deform in a new medium, pass through noise while keeping its form, or meet a structure capable of amplifying it?

04 / Restoring force

Attention can be returned to its centre.

Hooke’s law describes an elastic restoring force: F = −kx. Semonika uses that relation as an operational mapping for attention displaced from its centre.

DISPLACEMENTRETURN → CENTRE
Physical relation

Elastic restoring force.

The equation and its physical meaning belong to mechanics and are attributed to Robert Hooke.

Semonic mapping

Return of attention.

The mapping of that restoring relation to attention and cognitive centre belongs to Semonika, authored by Dragan Cvetanović.

05 / Semantic memory field

On the web, related concepts attract.

In a semantic memory field of information, similar concepts gather through their relations. Search, documents, links and knowledge structures make that attraction observable on the internet. Semonika keeps the boundary visible: attraction is real as an operation, but it is never the only operation in the field.

06 / Attribution boundary

Source first. Extension signed.

The LCT definition is quoted from Karl Maton’s 2013 paper. The wider vocabulary of semonic forces and operations, their use in writing and the attention-restoring mapping are part of Semonika by Dragan Cvetanović.

KARL MATON / LCT

Semantic gravity, semantic density and semantic waves.

ROBERT HOOKE

Elastic restoring-force relation, F = −kx.

DRAGAN CVETANOVIĆ / SEMONIKA

The -sema operations and their semonic use.

MODEL BOUNDARY

A semonic mapping does not claim that meaning is a newly proven physical force.

Karl Maton, “Making semantic waves” (2013) ↗ · Semonika ↗